Challenges and Implications of International Humanitarian Law in Cyberspace Warfare
Keywords:
Cyber Technologies, IHL Principles, Nuclear Weapons, Civilian Object, Threat, InfrastructureAbstract
This study investigates the application of International Humanitarian Law (IHL) in the evolving landscape of cyberspace warfare, addressing the critical gap in existing legal frameworks regarding cyber operations. Utilizing a mixed-methods approach, including quantitative analysis of international protocols and agreements, the research identifies significant challenges in applying traditional IHL principles to cyber conflicts. The findings reveal inconsistencies in the regulation of cyber attacks, particularly in distinguishing between military and civilian targets and ensuring proportionality. The study concludes that current IHL principles are insufficient for the complexities of cyberspace, necessitating the development of new international norms and cooperation strategies. These results have significant implications for policymakers, highlighting the urgent need for updated legal frameworks to govern cyber warfare effectively.
References
A. Khalil, “NAVIGATING LEGAL FRONTIERS IN CYBER WARFARE: INSIGHTS FROM THE RUSSIA-UKRAINE CONFLICT,” Lawyer Q., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 252–267, 2024.
D. J. B. Svantesson, “Regulating a ‘Cyber Militia’ – Some Lessons from Ukraine, and Thoughts about the Future,” Scand. J. Mil. Stud., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 86–101, 2023, doi: 10.31374/sjms.195.
E. Oğurlu, “International Law in Cyberspace: An Evaluation of the Tallinn Manuals,” Ann. la Fac. Droit d’Istanbul, no. 73, pp. 327–344, 2023, doi: 10.26650/annales.2023.73.0010.
M. Watin-Augouard, “The boundary between cybercrime and cyberwar: An uncertain no-man’s land,” Conflicts, Crimes Regul. Cybersp., pp. 89–105, 2021, doi: 10.1002/9781119885092.ch4.
B. Pratama, “Tallinn manual: Cyber warfare in Indonesian regulation,” IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci., vol. 729, no. 1, 2021, doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/729/1/012033.
Z. Huang, “The application of the principle of distinction in the cyber context: A Chinese perspective,” Int. Rev. Red Cross, vol. 102, no. 913, pp. 335–365, 2020, doi: 10.1017/S1816383121000023.
M. A. Khan, “Reducing the Threat of Cyber Warfare Through a Suitable Dispute Resolution Mechanism,” Law J. Univ. Latv., vol. 2020, no. 13, pp. 97–120, 2020, doi: 10.22364/jull.13.06.
G. D. Brown, “International law and cyber conflict,” Routledge Handb. Int. Cybersecurity, pp. 366–378, 2020, doi: 10.4324/9781351038904-36.
J. Beard, “The principle of proportionality in an era of high technology,” Complex Battlespaces Law Armed Confl. Dyn. Mod. Warf., vol. 1, pp. 261–288, 2018, doi: 10.1093/oso/9780190915360.003.0009.
M. N. Schmitt, “Complex battlespaces: The law of armed conflict and the dynamics of modern warfare,” Complex Battlespaces Law Armed Confl. Dyn. Mod. Warf., vol. 1, pp. 1–528, 2018, doi: 10.1093/oso/9780190915360.001.0001.
P. Mali, “Cyber-terrorism as a non-state cyber warfare: An overview,” Int. J. Civ. Eng. Technol., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 859–872, 2018.
H. P. Faga, “The Implications of Transnational Cyber Threats in International Humanitarian Law: Analysing the Distinction Between Cybercrime, Cyber Attack, and Cyber Warfare in the 21st Century,” Balt. J. Law Polit., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1–34, 2017, doi: 10.1515/bjlp-2017-0001.
K. Kittichaisaree, “Application of the Law of Armed Conflict, Including International Humanitarian Law, In Cyberspace,” Law, Gov. Technol. Ser., vol. 32, pp. 201–231, 2017, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-54657-5_5.
C. Trezza, “Negotiation on cyber warfare,” Adv. Sci. Technol. Secur. Appl., pp. 257–264, 2017, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-54975-0_16.
J. Domínguez-Bascoy, “War-like activities in the cyberspace: Applicability of the law of armed conflicts,” Adv. Sci. Technol. Secur. Appl., pp. 243–256, 2017, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-54975-0_15.
D. Garcia, “Future arms, technologies, and international law: Preventive security governance,” Eur. J. Int. Secur., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 94–111, 2016, doi: 10.1017/eis.2015.7.
Kommersant US intelligence agencies have confirmed a large-scale cyber attack on the government. – [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/4616730 (access date: 01/16/2021)
Danelyan A.A. International legal regulation of cyberspace. – [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/mezhdunarodno-pravovoeregulirovanie-kiberprostranstva (date of access: 01/16/2021)
D- Russia The Russian Foreign Minister called for the development of a universal international code of conduct in cyberspace. – [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: https://www.iksmedia.ru/news/5694541-Glava-MID-RF-prizval-vyrabotat-univ.html (access date: 01/16/2021)
Kovacic L. The Chinese example is contagious. – [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: https://www.vedomosti.ru/opinion/articles/2019/01/28/792659-primer (access date: 01/16/2021)
Lankov A. Is there Internet in the DPRK and who can use it? – [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: https://profile.ru/abroad/chtoby-ne-dopustit-kramoly-vsevernoj-koree-sozdali-svoyu-sistemu-interneta-251402/ (access date: 01/16/2021)
D. J. B. Svantesson, “Regulating a ‘Cyber Militia’ – Some Lessons from Ukraine, and Thoughts about the Future,” Scand. J. Mil. Stud., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 86–101, 2023, doi: 10.31374/sjms.195.
E. Oğurlu, “International Law in Cyberspace: An Evaluation of the Tallinn Manuals,” Ann. la Fac. Droit d’Istanbul, no. 73, pp. 327–344, 2023, doi: 10.26650/annales.2023.73.0010.
M. Watin-Augouard, “The boundary between cybercrime and cyberwar: An uncertain no-man’s land,” Conflicts, Crimes Regul. Cybersp., pp. 89–105, 2021, doi: 10.1002/9781119885092.ch4.
B. Pratama, “Tallinn manual: Cyber warfare in Indonesian regulation,” IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci., vol. 729, no. 1, 2021, doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/729/1/012033.
Z. Huang, “The application of the principle of distinction in the cyber context: A Chinese perspective,” Int. Rev. Red Cross, vol. 102, no. 913, pp. 335–365, 2020, doi: 10.1017/S1816383121000023.
M. A. Khan, “Reducing the Threat of Cyber Warfare Through a Suitable Dispute Resolution Mechanism,” Law J. Univ. Latv., vol. 2020, no. 13, pp. 97–120, 2020, doi: 10.22364/jull.13.06.
G. D. Brown, “International law and cyber conflict,” Routledge Handb. Int. Cybersecurity, pp. 366–378, 2020, doi: 10.4324/9781351038904-36.
J. Beard, “The principle of proportionality in an era of high technology,” Complex Battlespaces Law Armed Confl. Dyn. Mod. Warf., vol. 1, pp. 261–288, 2018, doi: 10.1093/oso/9780190915360.003.0009.
M. N. Schmitt, “Complex battlespaces: The law of armed conflict and the dynamics of modern warfare,” Complex Battlespaces Law Armed Confl. Dyn. Mod. Warf., vol. 1, pp. 1–528, 2018, doi: 10.1093/oso/9780190915360.001.0001.
P. Mali, “Cyber-terrorism as a non-state cyber warfare: An overview,” Int. J. Civ. Eng. Technol., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 859–872, 2018.
H. P. Faga, “The Implications of Transnational Cyber Threats in International Humanitarian Law: Analysing the Distinction Between Cybercrime, Cyber Attack, and Cyber Warfare in the 21st Century,” Balt. J. Law Polit., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1–34, 2017, doi: 10.1515/bjlp-2017-0001.
K. Kittichaisaree, “Application of the Law of Armed Conflict, Including International Humanitarian Law, In Cyberspace,” Law, Gov. Technol. Ser., vol. 32, pp. 201–231, 2017, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-54657-5_5.
C. Trezza, “Negotiation on cyber warfare,” Adv. Sci. Technol. Secur. Appl., pp. 257–264, 2017, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-54975-0_16.
J. Domínguez-Bascoy, “War-like activities in the cyberspace: Applicability of the law of armed conflicts,” Adv. Sci. Technol. Secur. Appl., pp. 243–256, 2017, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-54975-0_15.
D. Garcia, “Future arms, technologies, and international law: Preventive security governance,” Eur. J. Int. Secur., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 94–111, 2016, doi: 10.1017/eis.2015.7.
Kommersant US intelligence agencies have confirmed a large-scale cyber attack on the government. – [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/4616730 (access date: 01/16/2021)
Danelyan A.A. International legal regulation of cyberspace. – [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/mezhdunarodno-pravovoeregulirovanie-kiberprostranstva (date of access: 01/16/2021)
D- Russia The Russian Foreign Minister called for the development of a universal international code of conduct in cyberspace. – [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: https://www.iksmedia.ru/news/5694541-Glava-MID-RF-prizval-vyrabotat-univ.html (access date: 01/16/2021)
Kovacic L. The Chinese example is contagious. – [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: https://www.vedomosti.ru/opinion/articles/2019/01/28/792659-primer (access date: 01/16/2021)
Lankov A. Is there Internet in the DPRK and who can use it? – [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: https://profile.ru/abroad/chtoby-ne-dopustit-kramoly-vsevernoj-koree-sozdali-svoyu-sistemu-interneta-251402/ (access date: 01/16/2021)
Downloads
Published
2024-07-29
How to Cite
Urmanova Madinahon Azizbek Kizi. (2024). Challenges and Implications of International Humanitarian Law in Cyberspace Warfare. Central Asian Journal of Social Sciences and History, 5(4), 147–153. Retrieved from https://www.cajssh.casjournal.org/index.php/CAJSSH/article/view/1109
Issue
Section
Articles
